DETAILED REPORTS ARE POSTED DAILY ABOUT THE AFRIKANER/BOER GENOCIDE- also visit Farmi Tracker for the latest updates

Contact Me

Adriana Stuijt
censorbugbear@gmail.com
Nol_Stuijt@hotmail.com
tel Netherlands_31_519_701_266

ASYLUM:
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.nl/2012/06/asylum-emigration-info-for-sa-whites.html

PHOTOALBUM 2009-2012
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.nl/p/photo-gallery.html

Crime Busters of SA: farm murders 2001-2003
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.nl/2003/12/crime-busters-of-sa-2001-2003-farm.html

Solidarity trade union: - list of farm murders
2003 - June 2009:
http://www.solidariteitradio.co.za/wp-content/uploads/plaasaanvalle.pdf


Search

Loading...

Followers

Blog Archive

About Me

My Photo
A Stuijt
Retired South African medical journalist, ex-Sunday Times of Johannesburg.
View my complete profile
Friday, 29 April 2011

Jeanette Odendaal called 10111 before execution

Print Friendly and PDF

Jeanette Odendaal called 10111 before a black SAPF sergeant shot her dead outside Kempton Park police station
on April 28 2011.

Odendaal Jeanette EXECUTED BY COP PHONED 10111 BEFORE HE SHOT HER April 29 2011 - The unarmed Afrikaner woman was calling 10111 on her cellphone just moments before a black Kempton Park police-sergeant shot her at close range, killing her. She was parked outside the police station inside her car on Tuesday night.

More than 1,000 people fell victim to excessive police violence last year…

The SA independent police directorate also admitted today that more than 500 people were shot dead and/or assaulted by police members in the previous book year.  In addition there have also been 566 people who died while they were in police custody. The SA police this year also got renamed to the SA Police Force, instead of SA Police Service.

the fact that Jeanette Odendaal was on her cellphone inside her car with her window rolled up, calling the 10111 emergency number, showed she was ‘in distress’,  said a close girl-friend In an exclusive interview with Express journalist Gerhardt Theron.  The girlfriend did not want to be identified publicly. She spoke to Theron at the Kempton Park Police Station on Friday, April 29 while  the Commissioner of Police spoke to Odendaal's father Nick Odendaal and also to her female partner in a blaze of media attention.  Print, radio end television media swamped the station as national police commissioner Bheki Cele and Gauteng Police Commissioner Mzwandile Petros, spoke to the family. The female friend told Theron that ‘it looked as if the bullet entered through Odendaal's shoulder, came out of her chest and then ricochetted from the car back into her stomach.” Odendaal lived in Aston Manor with her female partner and had no children. The black sergeant has been with the force for 17 years.

Killer cop case postponed -
 The case against SA Police Force sergeant Manape Phineas Kgoale, 38, was postponed during his remand hearing in regional court 2 in Kempton Park. After three hours of confusion Kgoale appeared briefly and had his case postponed to May 4 for a bail application. He was not asked to plead, however he is facing a charge of murder. The court also heard he might be charged with a schedule 5 or 6 offence, depending on whether he had previous convictions.Up until a few minutes before Kgoale appeared, court officials deliberately sent reporters on a wild goose chase looking for him around the courthouse. Relatives of Odendaal and police officers also were at court: the latter showed up to ‘show support for their colleague’.  Kgoale's family refused to comment.


http://www.looklocal.co.za/looklocal/content/en/kempton-park/kempton-park-news-crime?oid=4374815&sn=Detail&pid=490115&Odendaal-called-10111-moments-before-she-was--killed-by-policeman

http://www.looklocal.co.za/looklocal/content/en/kempton-park/kempton-park-news-crime?oid=4374815&sn=Detail&pid=490115&Odendaal-called-10111-moments-before-she-was--killed-by-policeman

SAPS 566 PEOPLE KILLED IN POLICE CUSTODY IN 2010 Sowetan

Historic Boer land at Hartbeespoort faces land grab

Print Friendly and PDF


reposted from 19 Oct 2009 


“Like A Land Grab” – The historic Boer Voortrekker communities of Meerhof, Schoemansville, Kosmos - whose land rights have been entrenched for at least the past 72 years by law,  and live in the areas which now surround the Hartbeespoort dam’s shoreline, are facing land- and water-access rights problems due to the ANC-regime's “Harties Dam Remediation programme’ ..the so-called Harties Metsi A Me -- a land- programme which can only be described as a land grab… 


And at the same time, the Afrikaner families who in many cases, have lived for many years in this area,  are also under siege from armed militia-style gangs attacking their homesteads. A clear warning was sounded on December 16 2010, when Boer Voortrekker scion Tolstoi Schoeman was murdered in his bed at his homestead and wife Gudrun brutally assaulted.












-------------------------------------------


Background - Monday 19 October 2009 By Dolf Dreyer


Hartbeespoort Snake_An_AnimalPark Haretbeespoortdam Property rights problems Oct 19 2009“It’s a land grab, that’s the only way one can describe it!” Speaking to MadibengPulse is Mr. Jack Seale, left,  who with his wife Heather own the Hartbeespoort  Snake  and  Animal  Park  which  is  located  on  the  only property,  he says, “which has commercial rights along the shores of the Hartbeespoort Dam”…
Speaking out on behalf of property owners in Meerhof, Schoemansville and Kosmos who have riparian rights dating from 1922 to 1937 firmly entrenched in the title deeds of their properties, Jack Seale is objecting to the intentions evident from the discussions during the process which would disown or devalue the rights individual properties have in these suburbs. Read article: http://www.madibengpulse.co.za/?Task=system&CategoryID=29032&HeadingText=Property+191009+jack+seale#dwaf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iUwKsuJ-0c

“There is also an evident intention of granting rights to instances, such as the developments around the Hartbeespoort Dam to people who had no prior rights, and it is for that reason that Jack Seale calls the process a “land grab,” writes Dreyer.
The developments, very recently in terms of the long history of Hartbeespoort Dam, converted from agricultural to residential zoning and there were no access rights attached to the farms which went into making up these developments. Such riparian rights as they had, allowed them to water their cattle and not wholesale access to hundreds of properties for leisure purposes.
“Why would unlimited access for the residents of recent developments who front on the water be a problem, since they have properties on the foreshore anyway?” asks Seale – who says  that spurious claims for these, as well as the intention to limit access to the Dam on a planned basis, had been made at the meetings of the Dam Remediation programme. This would mean that properties which had no prior rights would infringe on the rights of those who have held rights for at least 70 years. http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/dwaf-continues-to-develop-hartebeespoort-dam-resource-management-plan-2008-03-28
Hartbeespoort Dam resource management plan is a land grab claims oldtime resident owner “Say for instance,” he explained, “that the Dam management planning currently in process, determines that no more 400 vessels will be allowed on the Dam at any one time, or on any one day and that claims for access by complexes number 300, would that mean that only 100 boats of property owners with existing rights will be allowed access to the Dam at that particular time? Would that not infringe on the rights of property owners who have had those rights for however long their properties have been registered? Because the rights of the original riparian rights holders – those who hold deeds to a title in Meerhof, Schoemansville and Kosmos – are forever entrenched in those deeds, and no subsequent law of whatever nature can interfere with those rights which are entrenched in the Constitution.
To understand the legal basis...
To understand and appreciate the legal basis of all of this, one has to go back to the origin of Hartbeespoort Dam,” Jack Seale explains.

  • After the first World War the South African government decided to build Hartbeespoort Dam with two objectives in mind;
  • 1. to create a reservoir to water irrigation canals for intensive farming, mainly tobacco and vegetables; and,
  • 2. to provide employment for thousands of poor Afrikaner whites who were jobless after the war. The current use of the Dam for leisure purposes came later and is still just a subsidiary purpose.
The land under the Dam consisted of farms belonging to General Hendrik Schoeman, who left them to his son Johan when he died in 1901. 


A Schoeman descendant, the affable, liberal Boer Tolstoi Schoeman, was murdered on the Day of the Vow on his farm: on  December 16 2010, strangled with his pyjama pants by a group of black males who attacked the couple in their bedroom. Mrs Schoeman was viciously assaulted but survived. Only two of the black attackers have been arrested and charged. They were released on a small bail-amount. The trial is in June. 


Johan Schoeman offered the government a bargain:
At the asking price of £85,000 Johan Schoeman thought he was offering the government a bargain, but because of the war, the government did not have the money to pay the asking price. In the end a deal was concluded whereby £35,000 would be paid for the land under the water plus a 100- year flood line servitude.
  • In addition to the cash, Schoeman would retain the remaining land as well as getting township rights around the Dam plus the rights to commercial activities, such as boating, on the Dam.
The deal was concluded in 1918 and the government started building the Dam and Johan Schoeman started developing townships at about 1922. In order to make the purchase of the stands attractive to buyers, especially since the Dam was then, considered to be a considerable distance from the cities, the stand were advertised as having entrenched in their title deeds, the right of access to the water.
  • The township of Schoemansville was proclaimed in 1922, Meerhof in 1935 and Kosmos in 1937, and everybody who bought stands in those townships bought them with the right of access to the water.
  • These rights have not lapsed, according to Jack Seale, and they have not been supplanted by any legislation since their inception.
He also told MadibengPulse that he has the necessary documentation to back everything he says in this regard. As far as is known these three townships were the only inland residential stands in South Africa where the title deeds give the owner right of access to the water. Commercial rights did not extend to these rights, and according to Jack Seale, they are a separate issue, as well as a can of worms which does not need to be opened for the purpose of clarifying the rights of individual residential stand holders.


“Institutional Memory Loss”
Writes the journalist: “It is obvious that there is a great deal of ‘institutional memory’ loss which took place with the transition in 1994 and ignorance of legal statuses, records which are in disarray and willful annexation of rights and claims on rights which others possess, are causing much uncertainty – and irritation - in many areas.

A good example is the purported sale of Oberon and Kommandonek over which the legal department of the Department of Water Affairs and the Environment is till agonising over vesting rights as to which government department was actually authorised to sell the land as well as the situation of the servitudes held by the DWAF – and over which there is no argument.
Another example is the Hartbeespoort Dam management plan in the process of being devised and which, according to Jack Seale, seems to disregard the existing rights, inter alia, of property owners in Meerhof, Schoemansville and Kosmos.
Nobody, according to Jack Seale, neither DWAF nor the resorts around the Dam who were late comers as property owners here, can make any claims to disturb the existing rights of property owners in the three mentioned suburbs.
These rights have also not been superseded by any provision of the Water Act of 1998.
Any planning done by Harties Metsi A Me  or in terms of the Hartbeespoort Dam Management Plan, to restrict access to the Dam, should start from the basis of the existing rights and then superimpose new planning onto that.
  • In other words, DWAF, within the framework of the usage parameters – such as boat traffic - it sets as ideal for the Dam, should plan with the existing rights as a given.
  • Owners of existing rights will not accept alternatives, which have the affect of depreciating the value of their properties, entrenched in rights going back from 87 to 72 years.
Furthermore, to grant rights now for free which are not entrenched in title deeds - such as for the developments around the Dam – will devalue existing rights attached to those properties. From the initial inclusion of the rights in the title deeds, the rights have passed on to the successors to those titles and they are inseparable from property values in Meerhof, Schoemansville and Kosmos.
Seale said it was only ‘to eliminate unnecessary time and expenses in courts that he now offers to work with the DWAE officials, the Minister of Water Affairs and her legal department to sort out the legality of the existing rights, as well as to refresh the ‘institutional memory.”  He says this is the only basis on which planning for the future can be done. After all, he has the necessary documentation and information to do this, he points out.
Jack Seale also told MadibengPulse there was an attempt by DWAF in 1939 to allow water planes on the Dam but in the face of objections, based on existing rights by Johan Schoeman and property owners in the three suburbs, the plans were withdrawn.
Schoeman argued then that he was not objecting on the basis of rights granted by DWAF --  but on the basis of rights he ‘bought’ by a vastly reduced asking price for the land required to build the Dam.

Probe ANC for genocide: the hague petition

Print Friendly and PDF


http://bit.ly/fD3AgS  - The Hague, The Netherlands.  April 5, 2011. Mr Paul Kruger, the convenor and legal counsel of the Boer-Afrikaner Nation's Volksraadsverkiesingskomitee (VVK), walked into the International Criminal Court in The Hague on Tuesday-afternoon and handed in a  formal genocide-complaint against the Government of the Republic of South Africa and the African National Congress Party on behalf of the non-political, non-profit cultural ‘Verkenner’  movement.
GENOCIDE CHARGE LODGED AT ICC BY PAUL KRUGER THE HAGUE APRIL 5 2011
International Criminal Court in the Hague was asked to investigate genocide-charges against the ruling African National Congress and the SA government - targetting the Boer-Afrikaner nation:
The formal complaint, lodged by the cultural Verkenner movement, was formally accepted by an ICC official.   (source of this report:Adriana Stuijt a.j.stuijt@knid.nl).

Mr Kruger said the formal request was lodged on behalf of the entire Boer Afrikaner Nation by a  non-political, non-profit cultural organisation - the Verkenner Movement of SA.
    (contact: president Ben Geldenhuys, ben@bravoland.co.za)
 Verkenner Movement cultural organisation The cultural organisation asks the ICC in its petition to formally launch a thorough investigation into a charge of genocide against  the ruling African National Congress party and the Government of South Africa.
Earlier that day, Mr Kruger had also held a press conference at the Unrepresented Nations' and Peoples' Organisation (UNPO) nearby, highlighting the growing plight of his people. (link)  He is currently touring northern Europe to talk to representatives of human-rights organisations, international organisations such as UNPO, the news media and government officials. He will visit Belgium on Wednesday and was in Germany last week.

On the same day, it was also announced that the civil-rights movement Afriforum is also taking ANC youth leader Julius Malema to battle at the United Nations over his genocidal hatespeech campaign against the Boer-Afrikaner nation:
http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/afriforum-to-take-malema-battle-to-un-

The ICC-complaint lodged in The Hague on Friday provided several hundred pages of exploratory ANC SA govt GENOCIDE petition International criminal court The Hague Apr52011documentation for the ICC to peruse. It is only the start of the investigation process: there now will be a liaison-procedure created between the ICC and the complainants in South Africa to assist in the investigation.
The petition noted that 'specific experts amongst  the international community have already acknowledged and warned that a genocide is being conducted against the complainants - namely the Boer-Afrikaner nation. "
“Both accused parties (the ANC and the SA government) are not only creating a climate of violence in which such a racism-driven genocide can take place, but we also allege that the accused two parties also support it; and moreover are undertaking no specific steps to end the genocide against the complaint-nation.'
The Boer-Afrikaner nation is universally recognised as an individual nation with a unique ethnic-cultural culture, which is based on European origin but is rooted in Afrika, and primarily live within the legal borders of the Republic of South Africa, it was noted.


‘One-million Boer-Afrikaners already fled from the genocide being conducted:’
ArmedAttacksAgainstWhitesSAJan2011_March312011_graph_map The document submits that more than one-million of the Boer-Afrikaners have already fled from the country of their birth to many other foreign states to flee from the genocide being conducted against them. (picture: map and graph of number of attacks between January 2011 to March 31 2011. 
source: http://www.farmitracker.com
"The political party which currently rules South Africa - the African National Congress - gained hegemony 17 years ago, in 1994.  And while the international community describes it as a 'de jure democracy' because elections are held every five years, the ANC-rule rather is a 'de facto dictatorship' which due to the overwhelming race-driven black-majority block-voting, disallows any meaningful participation or influence on the electoral process by the Boer-Afrikaner nation.
In the past four decades  the now ruling party of South Africa and its front-organisations carried out and/or approved of acts of murder, torture, arson and terrorism and thus created an insane ‘culture of violence across the entire spectrum of society.”
“In the international area, the ruling ANC's gruesome reign of terrorism has been largely ignored while it was being supported as a 'freedom movement'. And such double-standards currently allow the ANC to maintain its culture of violence and its terrorism against the population of South Africa, in the apparent belief that the international community will continue to ignore such violence.”
“The Boer-Afrikaner has for the past decades, become a marginalised population-group which is being demonised in every possible way, through the government-controlled public newsmedia (SABC); through its educational curriculum, and through every other possible means, including all employers and business-owners being forced to hire blacks, while at the same time denying Boer-Afrikaners every opportunity to survive economically – thus forcing hundreds-of-thousands of Boer-Afrikaners into squatter-camps, and also forcing them to leave the country of their birth in search of a better environment.'
The document submits many examples of ‘the ANC-regime's willful, methodical and systematic physical elimination of the Boer-Afrikaner nation' including through violent means'. The document also submits that the 'overwhelming number of murderers of whites in South Africa are blacks; that very few whites are killed by other whites; and that very few whites kill blacks except in self-defence."
“The cumulative effect of all these policies and laws and activities by the Government of South Africa and by the ruling African National Congress party are having 'the cumulative effect  of a genocide' being perpetuated against the Boer-Afrikaner nation'.
The document points out that the ruling party and the government of South Africa have not only failed in their 'duty of care for the protection of the Boer-Afrikaner nation' but that their demonisation campaign of the Boer-Afrikaner nation also uses hatespeech slogans and music which deliberately incites blacks in South Africa to kill members of the  Boer-Afrikaner nation'.
The two accused parties also show a 'deliberate failure to take any specific steps to reduce the extraordinarily-high murder-percentage targetting the Boer-Afrikaner nation.'
The document also points to the deliberate disarming of the Boer-Afrikaner nation through rigid gun-control laws which severely interfere with the ability of the people to defend themselves with personal weapons while at the same time ‘many thousands of firearms disappear each year while under the control of the SA Police Service and other government-controled bodies'.
Many examples of race-driven violent actions, hatespeech incidents and terror-style attacks targetting many members of Boer-Afrikaner nation also were provided. However, Mr Kruger said this was only the first step in the process: upon his return to South Africa his organisation would continue to collect evidence through its ongoing “Projek 2010’ evidence-gathering project.

http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011/04/afrikaner-independence-discussed-in.html

http://paardekraalverkenners.blogspot.com/

sources, references:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Human rights violations on record include:
a) AFRIKANERS_PRETORIA-WAITING_FOODHANDOUTSFREEDOMFRONT Ethnic-cleansing of Afrikaners from their traditional farms, towns and cities through land-confiscation and armed violence:-  .. also includes the government-directed removal of  their cultural rights; the deliberate impoverishment of Afrikaners due to the near-total ban on access to the labour market in South Africa for all the Afrikaner-Boer workers under ANC-laws: creating hundreds of  Afrikaner ghetto-shantytowns where children suffer starvation (denied both food-aid and government support-benefits):
  • Dutch documentary by journalist  Saskia Vredeveld ( IKON-TV) "Arm Blanken/Poor Whites" : http://bit.ly/dREQkH

b) Laws created by ANC-regime bar all indigenous skilled 'white' citizens from entire SA labour market : the only legal criteria allowed for hiring workers is ‘racial representation” i.a. in favour of 94% black majority in each individual organisation:


c) Widespread armed attacks by youth-militias against urban and suburban Afrikaner/boer families -- accompanied by massive hatespeech campaign by ANC-regime' - which advocates use of genocidal hatespeech chant sat public meetings i.a.: 'Kill the Boer ' and " One Bullet One White infant   ’

Picture galleries of victims of the above: 2010/2011:
DVD of documentary "A Bloody Harvest" by SA TV-documentary producer Susan Puren of M-Net: 

d) Top genocide expert warns of Boers under serious threat from black-racists: Dr Gregory Stanton,  http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/countriesatrisk2010.html.
http://://www.genocidewatch.org/images/South_Africa_22_Aug_03_Farmers_tortured_and_murdered_due_to_racial_hatred_-_farm_attack_official_investigation_report.pdf

e) Current trials of black youths who slaughtered Afrikaner/Boer families - often execution-style, often accompanied with horrific sexual-mutilations etc are hardly reported in the mainstream English-language news media: http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011/03/court-dates-for-farm-murder-trials.html
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011_03_06_archive.html