Contact Me
Subscribe
Posts
All Comments
Search
Followers
Blog Archive
- ► 2012 (246)
- ► 2010 (847)
- ► 2009 (882)
About Me
- A Stuijt
- Retired South African medical journalist, ex-Sunday Times of Johannesburg.
Sunday, 17 July 2011
Shock pictures of ailing Pres. Jacob Zuma
18:33 | 
Posted by
A Stuijt |
Recent photographs have emerged from a function on July 13 2011, attended by President Jacob Zuma in Grahamstown, and which showed a very exhausted man. During the ceremony, he was seen to nod off three times. Various sources noted that he reportedly ‘walked listlessly” , that ‘his clothes and watchband seemed too big for him’ - and ‘that he had some kind of skin-problem which also made the skin on his hands peel off.’ He didn’t smile much either. Indeed many of the people present commented to each other that the man seemed to be a mere shadow of his former, energetic and very likeable, ebullient self.
Pictures copyright: Ettione Ferreira email etto07@gmail.com
Zuma, Grahamstown July 13 2011;
BELOW: PRES ZUMA JULY 13 2011 IN GRAHAMSTOWN
With all the unrest countrywide due to the never-ending strike, the fuel-pumps running dry, the food-shops growing emptier by the day and the hundreds of thousands of strikers increasingly aggressive, violent and belligerent, the country is rapidly spinning out of control: with Cosatu trade union movement leader promising two months of unrelenting strike action. Now more than ever, South Africa needs a physically healthy leader at the helm of the ship of State.
More pictures below.COPYRIGHT warning: the photographs of pres Zuma at Grahamstown can be purchased from the photographer, Ettioné Ferreira, at Etto07@gmail.com She is at the university and holds the copyrights on her photographs.
President Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma, President of the Republic of South Africa, wearing traditional wear including the skin of a cheetah, during a ceremony in Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 13 July 2011. The ceremony was to hand over a Freedom certificate scroll… Date: 07/13/11 pictures: Ettione Ferreira, Rhodes university: http://photojourn.ru.ac.za/gallery/v/2011+PAW/week+starting+11+July+2011/
____________________________________________________________________________________
His apparent exhaustion did not seem to curtail his public appearances. However he has made no statements whatsoever about the growing chaos in the country.
A comment was issued on July 14 2011 from the presidential office that he was ‘studying’ the report of the Public Protector on an investigation into complaints and allegations of maladministration, improper and unlawful conduct by the Department of Public Works and the South African Police Service, relating to the leasing of office accommodation in Durban.Not a word about the countrywide strikes, the violence…
Presidential contacts:
Zanele Mngadi
Cell: 082 330 1148
Bongani Majola
Cell: 082 339 1993
Cell: 082 330 1148
Bongani Majola
Cell: 082 339 1993
Source: The Presidency
On July 13, the day he looked so glum, he was granted the freedom of Grahamstown and viewed the Guard of Honour, there was a 21-round gun salute by the G1 88mm Gun Troop, a salute flight by two air force helicopters; and a national salute. On July 7 2011, Pres Zuma visited three Limpopo hospitals on an inspection tour with senior officials of his goverment’s sonamed Health Outcome project. He visited Siloam District Hospital, Vhembe: Lebowakgomo District Hospital, Lebowakgomo and the Lebowakgomo Hospital. He was accompanied by Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Minister Collins Chabane and Deputy Minister Dina Pule, Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan, Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi and Deputy Minister Dr Gwen Ramakgopa, Public Works Minister Gwen Mahlangu, Social Development Minister Bathabile Dlamini and Limpopo Premier Cassel Mathale as well as Limpopo Members of the Executive Council.
http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=20012&tid=37401
http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=19922&tid=37133
16 Jul 2011 ANC IN CHAOS, CONFLICT AND DISARRAY
Weekend Witness , Saturday , July 16 , 2011. Page 13
Peter Gumbi writes – MARGATE . “As a member of the ANC in good standing, I am disappointed by internal conflicts and use of state organs to fight internal battles. We had hoped that after the Polokwane conference there would be peace, harmony, unity and coherence in our movement. Little did we know that it would be deteriorate into anarchy. How will we celebrate the 100th anniversary when comrades stab, kill and plot against one another? Matthews Phosa has said that Polokwane would be a picnic compared to Mangaung and he is being proved correct every day. The brutal killings of Sbu Mkhize and Wiseman Mshibe, the Alpha Shelembe saga and burning of ANC offices, controvercy around so-called investigations into Willie Hofmeyr and Thuli Madonsela, the amigos corruption case, and the mistrust between the ANC top six and within provincial committees indicate an organisation in chaos and dissarray.How many people must die for my organisation to realise that the scramble for resources is deviding the ANC? The ANC needs a decisive leader and the ANC Youth League will make proposals for Kgalema Motlanthe to take over. President Jacob Zuma has failed to unite the ANC, the tripartite alliance and society. PETER GUMBI Margate”
BEFORE
Below: Zuma, Sept 2010: after hearing the news that he was going to be a father for the 22nd time…
Labels:
Afrikaners will perish without legal autonomy
We publish the following opinion-piece by South African anthropologist Cor Ehlers, a multi-talented Free State cattle-farmer who chairs the OASE organisation: its goal: to legally re-establish -- through the international community – an independent Afrikaner State on 6,5% of the total land-surface of South Africa – the territory where the Boers were settled permanently as independent republicans ever since the Great Trek. Their Facebook page just opened
-------------------------
Mr Ehlers is a seventh generation Afrikaner of German and Dutch descent both on his father’s and mother’s side. Paternal great grandfather Christiaan Ehlers fought in the Boers’ freedom wars in 1881 and1899-1902 against the invading colonial forces of Great Britain. Maternal great grandfather Ben Vorster, was a prisoner of war in Ceylon in 1902 and his wife was in a British concentration camp survivor: losing two children due to the horrendous conditions in those British death-camps 1901-1902. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Anthropology and Indigenous Law from the University of Pretoria. He ran a private security firm for 25 years, moving to the countryside to develop a guest farm in 2007 – www.poplargrove.co.za . Dutch-born Wife Dineke arrived as a young immigrant in SA with her parents and siblings in 1974. She holds a master’s degree in Afrikaans and Dutch from the University of South Africa; and is a lecturer there. The couple have one daughter, Marieke, who graduated in International Law (LLB)at the University of The Hague. Marieke was born and raised as an Afrikaner in South Africa, but decided to pursue her tertiary studies in The Netherlands, particularly after employment opportunities for whites (especially Afrikaners) were blocked by the ANC government’s anti-white black-economic-empowerment laws. Marieke continues her studies in LLM (International Law) from September at the University of Kent in the UK.Self-determination for Afrikaners and Boers is essential if they are to survive physically on the African continent:
Mr Ehlers writes:
“Due to my patriotic feelings for my own people and due to Marieke’s studies in International Law in The Hague, I have come to the conclusion that the only way in which Afrikaners will ever survive both culturally and physically in Africa will be through external self-determination and territorial sovereignty.
The concept of self-determination has always been seen as belonging to ‘a far-right minority’ amongst Afrikaners and the media -- and ANC propaganda has always succeeded in labelling any gesture in this direction as being ‘extreme rightwing’. The vast majority of Afrikaners, both in South Africa and abroad, are however yearning for a solution and with the correct approach we believe territorial sovereignty for Afrikaners can be achieved in the medium to long term. We have established an independent organisation, OASE (Onafhanklike Afrikaner-selfbeskikkingsekspedisie or: Independent Afrikaner self-determination expedition) which is not linked in any direct or indirect way to any political and/or cultural organisation. We have involved a number of academics and persons across a broad spectrum of Afrikaner society and this has resulted in some excellent research. We believe our endeavours will ultimately pay off since we carry no ‘right- or leftwing political baggage’.
We base our claims on the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Section 1.1 (and other relevant declarations and resolutions) which clearly states:
- ‘All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.’
1. A clearly defined territory.
2. A permanent population of the group within the defined territory wishing to succeed from the unitary state.
3. An effective government.
4. The ability to enter into agreements with other sovereign states.
* A fifth requirement has subsequently developed in International Law, i.e. the new state should underwrite and promote basic human rights.
In the past until June 2010, this uti possidetis iuris principle was a serious obstacle for Afrikaners who desired external self-determination, since secession could only take place if former colonial borders remained intact -- which would have meant that Afrikaners would have ended up as yet another minority in one or both of the former Boer Republics (Freestate and Transvaal) which were colonized in 1902 after a vicious scorched-earth war by colonial invader Great Britain. However this changed after the outcome of the Kosovo case in the ICJ in the Hague in June 2010 – and also, due to tremendous pressure from legal advisers since the crumbling of East European states, the uti possidetis rule has become less important.
- This means Afrikaners can now claim territory where they form the majority within a specific region by drawing borders in a way which will exclude millions of blacks – many of whom are migrants from borders north of present-day South Africa. The territory which OASE has identified, based on anthropoligical, archaeological, historical and economic research formed integral parts of the former Boer Republics and is commonly known as the Highveld region of South Africa, linked with a corridor to the Northern Natal coast to include the harbour of Richards Bay and the World Heritage coastal enclave of St Lucia Bay.
International supportThe only way through wich a people can obtain external self-determination which will successfuly result in territorial sovereignty, is if such a new state is recognised by the international community.
- Afrikaners’ endeavours will therefore have to run in tandem with diplomatic processes so that international partners can recognise the new state’s sovereignty, whether it is obtained through peaceful negotiations or through an Unilateral Declaration of Independence.
During apartheid the state of Israel was always a strong international partner of Afrikaners and we believe this may well be the case again should Afrikaners gain sovereignty. An Afrikaner agricultural union (TLU SA) has also managed to build excellent relations with Georgia and we have hope that that country will recognise eventual Afrikaner sovereignty.
Moreover, Afrikaners have always maintained strong cultural ties with the Flemish in Belgium which could result in that country also recognising our new state.
The winds of change currently blowing over Western Europe where support for nationalism is growing daily, could result in countries such as The Netherlands and Germany also ultimately recognising Afrikaner sovereignty. Ultimate recognition would obviously come if the USA recognizes our sovereignty and this will probably only happen under Republican rule.
ANC-regime is alienating its Western partners:The ANC government is slowly alienating its western partners by embracing China, as well as rogue states such as North Korea and Libya and Zimbabwe. We believe the strategic location of a western ally (especially with harbour facilities) in Southern Africa would certainly raise the West’s consideration for recognition of an independent Afrikaner state.
International Law clearly prohibits violence as a method to obtain external self-determination, unless the unitary state becomes the aggressor and the minority wishing to secede acts in self-defence - another reason why our endeavours will not result in any success without international support.
Where else could Afrikaners –- who now face physical annihilation -- survive culturally and physically?Afrikaners have only one ‘heimat’ and that is South Africa; should the international community not recognise Afrikaners’ right to external self-determination, then they should tell us where else we can survive culturally and physically and issue us with the necessary passports so that we can emigrate to such a country on a mass scale.
OASE will be embarking on a marketing and fundraising campaign within the next few months in order to raise support for external self-determination under the majority of Afrikaners who already reside in the defined territory, but also under those who fall outside the said territory including the more than half a million Afrikaners who have already settled abroad due to the ever-increasing crime rate since 1994 and because they are being deliberately barred from public life, including the job market, by the ANC-regime’s anti-white black-economic empowerment laws.
The Afrikaners will claim 6,5% of the total land surface – as a minority group they are 6% of the total population:The option which OASE will be offering Afrikaners comprises approximately 6,5% of the country’s total land surface; Afrikaners as a minority group constitute 6% of the total population of South Africa.
- Afrikaners have lived in that specific territory continuously since the Great Trek in 1836
- The area which we have identified was tamed by Afrikaners who settled there in large numbers since the Great Trek in 1836 and which will include the Afrikaner suburbs of the two predominantly Afrikaner cities of Bloemfontein and Pretoria as well as several other Afrikaner towns of cultural and historical value to Afrikaners. The area is economically sustainable and could be developed further into a wealthy independent state where all Afrikaners (approximately 3 million) can ultimately survive, should this ever become necessary.
COR EHLERS, Chairman: OASE
http://oase.za.net/?page_id=156
Verset is ons Christelike plig
Gaan ons veg of gaan ons vlug? Verset is ons Christelike plig! Maar watter vorm van Verset? http://bit.ly/kWdH4u"Die Boerevolk word nou opgeroep tot ‘n groot waagstuk. Kom ons wees eerlik en reguit met mekaar. Vryheid het altyd ‘n duur prys om te betaal. In ons volk se geskiedenis was die vryheid selfs so duur soos 26,000 vrouens en kinders. Ons volk staan nou voor die kruispad. Verset, of vlug. Emigreer of verset. Elkeen van ons sal nou moet kies. Gaan ons veg of gaan ons vlug? skryf Donkerhoek@Verkenners.org.za:
( 'Boers are approaching Stage 6 out of the eight stages of Genocide warns Dr Gregory Stanton of GenocideWatch: http://bit.ly/k5SfVH )
Na die naweek waartydens die ANCYL sy finale rewolusie teen ons volk geproklameer het, is verskeie volksgenote geskok, verward, kwaad en ‘n groot klomp bloot net depressief. Interessant genoeg word daar net gepraat van immigrasie en verset. Nie van hofsake en aanklagte van haatspraak nie. Nee... net die twee – Emigrasie en Verset.
Ek emigreer? NOOIT! Maar dan die term wat verswyg word deur ons volk – VERSET. Verset het my aan die dink gesit. Daar is soveel vrae – wat is verset? Hoe werk verset? Is die volk reg vir verset? Mag ek as Christen in verset gaan teen die regering? Is verset nou nodig? Om die vraag te antwoord kan mens net deur die koerante blaai.
Orals spring die woorde ‘oorlog, skiet, rewolusie’ uit
Ons kan net die kommentaar van forum en internet gebruikers waarneem. Orals spring die woord “oorlog, skiet, rewolusie” ens uit. In die veilige omgewing van skuil agter ‘n skuilnaam is dit duidelik dat die volk nou in verset wil gaan. Hulle is gereed daarvoor, maar is bang of onseker.
Die moorde neem net toe, die verdrukking op ekonomiese terrein begin al hoe feller toegepas word en Malema gebruik ook woorde soos ‘rewolusie, oorlog, vyande ens ens”. Hier is konflik op pad. Die volk wil in verset gaan. Maar hy is onseker en/of bang. Verset is ‘n onbekende faktor wat ons liewers wil vermy net omdat dit ons laat dink aan die Boeremag of aan oorlog.
Die vraag wat dan altyd opduik is - mag ons as Christene dan in verset gaan teen die regering?(Sonder om te veel verwysings oral in die skrywe te sit – ek het ‘n boekie gebruik in my navorsing van oorlede Prof Alkmaar Swart, Verset en Vryheid om my te help die skrywe opstel)
Verset teen ‘n owerheid?
Wanneer mag, of selfs moet, ‘n volk tot verset kom teen die owerhede wat oor hom gestel is? Om die vraag te beantwoord, moet ons eerstens by die staanspoor begin deur te se dat ons volk se wortel van ons volksbestaan Calvinisties is. Die grootste gedeelte van ons volk is Calvinisties. Dit is hoe ons grootgemaak is. Dit is die wortel van ons volk se bestaan. Nou waar eindig die plig tot gehoorsaamheid en waar begin die plig tot verset? Die Nederlandse Calvinistiese geskiedskrywer en wysgeer Groen van Pinsterer maak die volgende uitspraak in sy boek Ongeloof en Revolutie :
- “Ons daarenteen beweer dat die Heilige Skrif die grondslae van reg en sedelikheid, van gesag en vryheid, ook vir volke en regerings aanwys. Die Bybel is die onbedrieglike toetssteen. Onvoorwaardelike onderwerping aan Gods Woord was steeds die waarborg van pligmatige gehoorsaamheid en van pligmatige verset”.
- “Ons glo dat ons goeie God vanweë die verdorwenheid van die menslike geslag konings, vorste en owerhede aangestel het. Dit is immers Sy wil dat die wêreld deur middel van wette en regerings geregeer moet word, sodat die losbandigheid van die mense in bedwang gehou kan word en alles onder die mense ordelik kan verloop. Vir dié doel het Hy die owerheid die swaard in die hand gegee om die kwaaddoeners te straf (Rom 13:4) en die deugsames te beskerm.”
Dit is dus wel so dat ons aan die owerheid gehoorsaam moet wees, maar slegs sovêr hulle Gods ryk uitbou soos opgesom in artikel 36 van die NGB.
- Daar staan tog duidelik : “En dit is nie alleen hulle taak om aan die staatsbestuur aandag te gee en daaroor te waak nie maar ook om die heilige Woordbediening te beskerm, om sodoende alle afgodery en valse godsdiens teen te gaan en uit te roei, die ryk van die antichris te vernietig en die koninkryk van Jesus Christus te bevorder, die Woord en die evangelie orals te laat verkondig”
So is die gesag en wettigheid van ‘n owerheid dan onbeperk? Verseker nie! Owerhede wat God uitsluit en hulself in God se plek stel, is dan verseker onwettig en oorskry hulle gesag. Dit gee aan elke onderdaan die reg om in verset te kom. Die Woord is duidelik dat ons God meer gehoorsaam moet wees as mense (Hand 5:29). In Calvyn se Institusie maak hy dit ook duidelik in slotartikel 32 van slothoofstuk 20 soos volg :
- “Ons is dus gehoorsaamheid aan die owerhede verskuldig. Egter altyd met hierdie bepaling daarby dat die gehoorsaamheid ons nie ongehoorsaam moet maak aan Hom, aan wie se wil al die begeertes van die konings onderworpe moet wees, vir wie se majesteit hulle almal moet buig nie. Hoe verkeerd sal dit nie wees om Hom te beledig ten einde mense tevrede te stel nie. Hy is die Koning van die konings.”
Dit dwing dus ons as volk om in verset te kom teen die regering aangesien hulle duidelik ons God vertrap in hulle grondwet, hulle parlement, hulle wette, hulle uitsprake, hulle bedrog ens. Om nie eers te praat van hulle plig om afgodery uit te roei, die Woordbediening te beskerm en die koninkryk van Jesus Christus uit te bou nie.
Ons mag onbeskaamd dit uitskreeu: Ons wil vry wees!
Nou het ons wel vir onsself uitgeklaar dat ons mag in verset kom een die owerheid wat oor ons aangestel is. Ons mag onbeskaamd dit uitskreeu : Ons wil vry wees!
- Maar ‘n Christenvolk moet die wettige en grondwetlike weg volg tot die doodloop.
Lydelike en aktiewe verset is Gesag-Onbehoorsaamheid en Wet-vermyding:
Dit is volgens my die beste en ordelikste manier om onder ‘n on-christelike regering uit te kom. Indien die nood en onregte egter nie langs die manier reggestel kan word nie, kan daar oorgegaan word na lydelike en aktiewe verset. Dit behels gesag-ongehoorsaamheid en wet-vermyding.
Hieroor het Prof HG Stoker wel iets by te se in boek Die stryd om die ordes :
- “Watter oplossing, watter metode van oorwinning van die noodsituasie ook gevind mag word, - die Calvinis is dan alleen geregverdig om daardie metode enduit toe te pas, en mag alleen dan Gods seen op sy bemoeiinge verwag, - as hy in sy gemoed oortuig is, dat wat hy onderneem, volgens die lig van Gods Woord en werklik volgens sy oortuiging die wil van God is.”
Verder is dit belangrik dat die reg van verset nooit die enkeling toekom nie, maar moet deur die volk gevolg word. Waar daar ‘n klomp volksgenote bymekaarkom en die wil van verset uitspreek, is dit geregverdig as dit gemeet kan word aan Gods Woord.
Noudat ons vir onsself uitgeklaar het dat daar wel deur ‘n volk in verset mag gaan teen ‘n on-christelike owerheid, sal ons moet definieer wat is verset en watter verset modelle daar kan wees. Die beste om so iets na te fors is in ons eie volksgeskiedenis. Die Boeregeskiedenis bied ‘n uitstekende , werkbare model vir ons: http://www.vvk.co.za/8948/index.html
Die VVK is ‘n administratiewe liggaam, wat soortgelyke werk doen as die IEC ("Independent Electoral Commission") maar slegs binne volksverband.Die VVK sentrale komitee bestaan uit:Paul Kruger (Voorsitter) Tim van der Westhuizen (Adjunk-voorsitter), Danie Pretorius, Hannes van der Merwe, Ivan Martens, Willie Steenkamp, Albert du Toit. Registreer uself as lid van die Volk by: http://www.vvk.co.za/8948/index.html
BOEREVERSETFW de Klerk se verraad in 1992 beskou baie van ons volksgenote as die grootste vernedering wat ons volk nog gely het. Daar was egter net so groot vernedering vir ons volk op 12 April 1877 toe Shepstone met net 25 polisiemanne sonder enige slag of stoot die Transvaal geannekseer het en die Union Jack gehys het. Die oorname was vooruitgegaan deur President Burgers wat ‘n liberale hervormingsbeleid begin toepas het, en so die volk se veggees en vryheidsgees geblus het. Eers toe die harde werklikheid van vreemde oorheersing tot die volk gekom het, het hulle ‘n verset-gees begin ontwikkel. Kruger het in daardie tyd die weg van onderhandelinge gevolg. Daar is ‘n vryheidsafvaardiging verkies om die volk se vryheid te gaan opeis. Die eerste vryheidsafvaardiging was Kruger en Jorissen. In Desember 1877 het die afvaardiging egter met onverrigte sake teruggekom. 7 Januarie 1878 het sowat 1,000 burgers opgedaag in Pretoria om verslag te kom ontvang van die vryheidsafvaardiging. Dit was ‘n onstuimige vergadering en die leiers was self baie verbaas om die verandering in die volk waar te neem.
Versoekskrif: eis om ons vryheid terug te gee:
Die volgende stap wat Kruger hulle gevolg het was om ‘n versoekskrif op te stel wat die volksgenote moes teken. Die versoekskrif het dit duidelik gestel dat die volk sy vryheid wil terughê. Tydens die tydperk van handtekening insameling is daar 5 volksvergaderings belê. Die eerste was in April 1878 waartydens 1,154 boere byeengekom het by Doornfontein -- ten spyte van Shepstone se verbod op publieke vergaderings. Daarna is die vryheidsafvaardiging weer gestuur na die Engelse. Hulle het egter weer teruggekeer met onverrigte sake. Die patroon van vryheidsafvaardiging, verslag en volksvergaderings het egter begin vrugte afwerp.
Die volk het in meer en meer getalle by die vergaderings opgedaag en allomeer lydelike verset begin toepas. Die getalle van die volksvergaderings toon duidelik dat die volk al hoe meer oortuig begin raak het dat verset die enigste uitweg was :
Doornfontein April 1878 1,154
Kleinfontein Maart 1879 11 maande na vorige 4,000
Wonderfontein Desember 1879 10 maande na vorige 5,000
Paardekraal Desember 1880 2 maande na vorige 10,000
Meningsopname:
Wat ook interessant is, is ‘n meningsopname wat by Kleinfontein gehou is. Daar is gekyk of die volk reg is vir gewapende protes of nie. Daar was 219 burgers ten gunste van geweld, 154 ten gunste van lydelike verset en 1,137 wat gewillig was om die meerderheid se besluit te aanvaar. Tans is dit net so met ons volk.
- Net ‘n handjie vol is bereid om ‘n besluit te neem. Die res val by die meerderheid in.
Tydens die openbare vergaderings is dit egter belangrik om te weet dat die lydelike verset deurentyd teenwoordig was. Daar was voorvalle van openlike verontagsaming van die landswette. Betalings van belastings is ontduik, ammunisie is onwettig verkry en daar was geweier om voor die howe te verskyn.
- Daar was egter twee groot aksies van lydelike verset wat uitgestaan het bo die res.
By Wonderfontein se vergadering is die Vierkleur weer vir die eerste keer gehys (dit was verbied). Britse gesag was luidkeels verwerp. Pretorius was as gevolg hiervan op 5 Januarie 1880 vir hoogverraad in hegtenis geneem. Daar het as gevolg daarvan 300 gewapende burgers opgeruk in Potchefstroom. Kruger moes dadelik soontoe gaan om die burgers tot bedaring te roep.
Bezuidenhout se wa
Die mees bekendste voorval van lydelike verset was sekerlik die voorval van Bezuidenhout se wa. Die vorm van lydelike verset was die vuurhoutjie in die kruitvat. Bezuidenhout het geweier om belasting te betaal, waarna die landdros beslag gele het op sy wa. Die wa moes op 11 November 1880 per openbare veiling verkoop word. Piet Cronje en 100 boere het egter hul opwagting gemaak en die bode van die hof van die wa geruk en die wa terugbesorg aan Bezuidenhout. Die gort was gaar en die Paardekraal vergadering was daardeur vervroeg van Januarie 1881 na 8 Desember 1880.
Paardekraal
By Paardekraal was daar besluit op oorlog sodat ons volk weer kon vry wees. As ons dan die Boere-verset model opsom, sal dit wees :
1. Vryheidsafvaardiging
2. Verslag en volksvergadering
3. Versoekskrif
4. Lydelike verset
5. Aktiewe verset
6. Wapenstryd
Die uitkoms hiervan was gevegsgereedheid, gevegsgedugtheid, roemryke oorwinnings, VRYHEID!
Die Boerevolk word nou opgeroep tot ‘n groot waagstuk. Kom ons wees eerlik en reguit met mekaar. Vryheid het altyd ‘n duur prys om te betaal. In ons volk se geskiedenis was die vryheid selfs so duur soos 26 000 vrouens en kinders.
Ons volk staan nou voor die kruispad. Verset, of vlug. Immigreer of verset. Elkeen van ons sal nou moet kies. Gaan ons veg of gaan ons vlug. Ek kies die Boere verset model.
Kom ons verkies ‘n volksraad (vryheidsafvaardiging) en laat hulle ons vryheid gaan opeis. Laat hulle terugkom en verslag doen aan die volk. Ons as volk sal tesame hiermee moet begin met lydelike verset. Dit mag dal oorspoel na aktiewe verset en selfs na gewapende verset. Maar laat ons dit end uit doen. Laat ons nou al begin praat van VERSET! Dit kan nie meer ‘n geborge, geslote term in ons volksmond wees nie. Dit moet deur ons gepraat en gedoen word. Die term moet in ons kinders se taal gevestig word. Ons volk kan net oorleef deur in verset te gaan.
Verset nie net omdat ons wil nie, maar ook omdat dit ons Christelike plig is! Donkerhoek@Verkenners.org.za
Die Volksraad Verkiesings Kommitee is ‘n administratiewe liggaam, wat soortgelyke werk doen as die IEC ("Independent Electoral Commission") maar slegs binne ons eie volksverband. Die VVK sentrale komitee bestaan uit:Paul Kruger (Voorsitter)Tim van der Westhuizen (Adjunk-voorsitter), Danie Pretorius, Hannes van der Merwe, Ivan Martens, Willie Steenkamp, Albert du Toit.
Registreer uself as lid van die Volk by: http://www.vvk.co.za/8948/index.html
http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogspot.com/2011/06/verset-is-ons-christelike-plig.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)